Read more Plus Minus My favourites Information about Innovation and entrepreneurship in education Favourite Download pdf-file Facebook
map

In this method, participants rethink and adapt their projects to a new reality after having introduced their project to collaboration partners and others and share new experiences and challenges.

Prior to the workshop, participants must be in the process of researching collaboration partners or users and submitting applications or contacting them to talk about possible projects and ideas. Many of them should be close to entering into a collaboration agreement or perhaps already having signed such an agreement.

‘Rethink your project’ is the last of three methods that are developed in relation to a co-curriculum internship at the University targeted at supporting students in establishing innovative or entrepreneurial academic internships. However, the methods can be used to develop all kinds of projects where the content is based on a combination of academic objectives, partner collaboration(s) and effectuation theory.

ABOUT EFFECTUAL CYCLE

In effectuation thinking, interaction with other people is seen as key in the project qualification and an important success factor. The starting point may be a project idea or a wish to collaborate with someone you have met in connection with clarification of project objectives. It may be a person you have met randomly or contacted proactively. Interaction with others always involves some degree of unpredictability, which can lead to new insights or even a joint obligation to proceed. The interaction is everything from informative conversations to binding collaboration. Interaction involves the production of new knowledge – new insights – and may result in a need to adapt and/or rethink the project. This is particularly important when several parties decide to enter into a binding collaboration. This will typically lead to a significant change in the project, as there are now two (or more) to make decisions. When several parties become involved in the same project, not only are more competencies and new capacity added to it, but the objective will typically change due to the parties’ different interests. This means that the project you had in mind at the beginning will undoubtedly change in some way or other during the collaboration. The effectual cycle represents the constant rethinking of ideas, the project and your overall options.

In connection with the academic internship, it often happens that the parties need to bend towards each other’s interests. This happens for example when students make a project agreement with an external company (and partner). This is exactly what the principles of ‘Effectual Cycle’, ‘Crazy Quilt’ and ‘Lemonade’ imply, which is a crucial theoretical input to how idea generation and qualification can be controlled. Project development happens through responsiveness to other people’s good advice, interests and through negotiations.

ABOUT SARASVATHY’S PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTUATION

Saras Sarasvathy’s theory of Effectuation (2001) describes an approach to making decisions and performing actions in entrepreneurship processes, where the next best step is identified by assessing the resources available in order to achieve the goals, while continuously balancing these goals with resources and actions.

Instructions

This method is primarily about following up on the realities that the projects have encountered when participants have been looking for collaboration partners and users. The workshop is to ensure that experiences are used constructively to challenge and reinforce the individual projects.

5-10 minutes: Introduction to the programme and the purpose of the workshop.

30 minutes: At the tables, participants share in groups of two or with everybody the current status of their project: who have they talked to, what have they talked about and what challenges have they encountered?

15 minutes: Everybody can ask questions and share challenges which have not been solved at the tables or which are considered as key issues. Participants should address these challenges and help each other.

15 minutes: In the groups, participants brainstorm on possible answers to the question: ‘What do you expect to learn or become better at in your project?’ – they start by making individual post-its for 3-5 minutes before sharing them on the table in the group and more post-its can be added subsequently.

15 minutes: The participants list skills and capabilities on a board for the whole group, so they may take inspiration from each other. There is no compulsion to list own answers. Questions about understanding specific words on the board are discussed jointly.

15 minutes: Each student fill in a new blank roadmap of their project based on our blank template.

30 minutes: Jointly or at the tables, students share their roadmap on which the others provide feedback.

15 minutes: In the end, the groups discuss a possible further collaboration on their projects. We suggest that students participate in two informal network meetings during the academic internships and consider the possibility of presenting their projects to each other after the internships along with what they have learned in the process.

Worth Considering

Consider next steps when participants have completed the workshops in which they have developed their projects. It would be good to set up informal meetings to share experiences and challenges during the realisation phase.

Preparation

Prior to the workshop, participants must be in the process of researching collaboration partners or users and submitting applications or contacting them to talk about possible projects and ideas. Many of them should be close to entering into a collaboration agreement or perhaps already having signed such an agreement. Participants should update their log and roadmap based on these experiences. In this way, this workshop is more about rethinking projects in a new reality, sharing new experiences and challenges as well as looking forward.

Examples Of Use

‘Rethink your project’ is the last of three methods that are developed in relation to a co-curriculum internship at the University targeted at supporting students in establishing innovative or entrepreneurial academic internships. The two other methods can be found below, and the whole project is described in the case ‘Three effectuation methods for innovative practice projects’ on the Toolbox website.

However, the methods can be used to develop all kinds of projects where the content is based on a combination of academic objectives, partner collaboration(s) and effectuation theory.

Sources

Sarasvathy, S (2001): What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial. The Darden Graduate School of Business Administration

Sarasvathy, S et. al. (2011): Effectual Entrepreneurship. Routledge

Kristiansson, Michael René (2018): Entreprenør-Proces-Projekt. Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Show all methods